Appendix: International comparisons (ILO standards)


Note for use of the appendix:
The appendix is divided into two parts. The international comparisons compiled by the ILO are shown on pages 29-31. Another international comparison compiled by the OECD is shown on pages 32-34. The Cost of Social Security in Japan is compiled according to the ILO standards. However, updates to the ILO database have been delayed for some time and the database remains old. Therefore, the OECD Social Expenditure Database is published for reference to more recent trends. Definitions in the two data are similar but not the same. In particular, the OECD reports expenditures more widely, which means the OECD includes the cost for investment in the facilities and equipment as well. Please be aware that Japan's data for the OECD exceeds that of the ILO for this reason.

Countries reporting the 19th investigation are limited as in the last year and, therefore, the most recent data in 1996 was published in Figure 1.

Figure 1 International comparison of Social Security Expenditure as a percentage of National Income
Figure1 International comparison of Social Security Expenditure as percentage of National Income

Table 1 International comparison of Social Security Expenditure as a percentage of National Income and Gross Domestic Product
Table1 International comparison of Social Security Expenditure as percentage of National Income and Gross Domestic Product
Sources:
The values of National Income and the GDP for Japan were quoted from the “Annual Report on National Accounts in the fiscal year 2004” by the Cabinet Office’s Economy Social Research Institute (Same applies hereinafter).
The values of national income and the GDP for the United States, Germany and Sweden were quoted from “National Account of OECD countries: Main Aggregates, vol. 1, OECD 2004” (Same applies hereinafter).


Figure 2 International comparison of Social Security Revenue by functional category
Figure2 International comparison of Social Security Revenue by functional category


Table 2 International comparison of Social Security Expenditure by functional category as a percentage of National Income
Table2 International comparison of Social Security Expenditure by functional category, as percentage of National Income
Notes:
The United States includes “Survivors” in the “Old age” category.
Sweden includes “Employment injury” in the “Invalidity benefits” category.


Figure 3 International comparison of Social Security Revenue by source
Figure3 International comparison of Social Security Revenue by source
Note:
As for the United States, the figure is the sum of the contributions from the federal government and from well as local governments.

Table 3 International comparison of Social Security Revenue as percentage of National Income
Table3 International comparison of Social Security Revenue as percentage of National Income
Note:
The United States has not separated the general government into the federal and local governments.

Return to the Contents

Return to the top page of The Cost of Social Security in Japan

Go back to the IPSS top page